As far as the statement of faith goes I think it does ok. It covers the fundamental ideas while being concise enough that people will bother to read it. In my view a statement of faith should leave room for debate on non-essential theology (e.g. Calvinism versus Arminianism) but not leave room for erroneous belief to slip in (e.g. Modalism).

That being said I think a couple of things could be better described in the current statement of faith with the addition of a few words. For instance:

I would add to the Trinity that God is one being made up of three personages and each personage is co-existent, co-eternal and fully God.

Ben is right in what he said regarding the section about Christ. Just mentioning that he has two natures doesn’t quite cut the mustard for me either. I’d like to see more of the hypostatic union outlined so there isn’t room to dilute or mix the two natures (no demi-gods allowed).

I also think the section on baptism should include not just the mode but take more of a stance against paedo-baptism and baptismal regeneration.

Including a statement about Christ returning (to judge the quick and the dead?) would also be worthwhile. I’d prefer the statement of faith had a heading for itself but I’m sure changing a website is a nuisance.